Side-by-side comparison
KILZ KILZ Original vs Sherwin-Williams LOXON Acrylic Conditioner N/A Clear
| Fact | KILZ Original | LOXON Acrylic Conditioner |
|---|---|---|
| Use | Interior primer | Exterior primer, Interior primer |
| Sheen · base | — | N/A · Clear |
| VOC (untinted) | 442 g/L | 0 g/L |
| VOC added by tint | Not stated | Not stated |
| Emissions testing | Not documented | Tested (GREENGUARD, LEED emissions) |
| Health certification | None found | None found |
| Safety Data Sheet warnings | 5 | None |
| Ingredient disclosure | Safety Data Sheet only | Partial (environmental data sheet) |
| Safety Data Sheet revised | 2/20/2026 | 8/19/2026 |
Highlighted rows are where the two products differ. Facts come from each maker's documents; "not disclosed" means the maker hasn't published it, not that the product failed a test.
See the score broken down by category
Free. Answer 4 quick questions and create your account.
Scores summarize the evidence makers publish. They don't guarantee safety or predict individual health outcomes. How we score
Sources
KILZ KILZ Original
Sherwin-Williams LOXON Acrylic Conditioner