Side-by-side comparison

Sherwin-Williams ProClassic Alkyd Interior Enamel Semi-Gloss Deep Base vs Sherwin-Williams ProMar 200 HP Zero VOC Interior Acrylic Semi-Gloss Ultradeep Base

Sherwin-Williams ProClassic Alkyd Interior Enamel canSherwin-WilliamsProClassic Alkyd Interior EnamelSemi-Gloss · Deep Base8BadReplace
Sherwin-Williams ProMar 200 HP Zero VOC Interior Acrylic canSherwin-WilliamsProMar 200 HP Zero VOC Interior AcrylicSemi-Gloss · Ultradeep Base73GoodReplace
Documented facts for both products
FactProClassic Alkyd Interior EnamelProMar 200 HP Zero VOC Interior Acrylic
UseInterior paintInterior paint
Sheen · baseSemi-Gloss · Deep BaseSemi-Gloss · Ultradeep Base
VOC (untinted)364 g/L0 g/L
VOC added by tintNot statedNot stated
Emissions testingNot documentedTested (GREENGUARD, LEED emissions)
Health certificationNone foundNone found
Safety Data Sheet warnings8None
Ingredient disclosurePartial (environmental data sheet)Partial (environmental data sheet)
Safety Data Sheet revised8/9/202610/15/2020

Highlighted rows are where the two products differ. Facts come from each maker's documents; "not disclosed" means the maker hasn't published it, not that the product failed a test.

See the score broken down by category
Free. Answer 4 quick questions and create your account.

Compare another

Scores summarize the evidence makers publish. They don't guarantee safety or predict individual health outcomes. How we score

Sources