Side-by-side comparison

Sherwin-Williams ProClassic Waterborne Interior Acrylic Enamel Gloss Extra White vs Sherwin-Williams ProMar 400 Zero VOC Interior Latex Paint Gloss Extra White

Sherwin-Williams ProClassic Waterborne Interior Acrylic Enamel canSherwin-WilliamsProClassic Waterborne Interior Acrylic EnamelGloss · Extra White48PoorReplace
Sherwin-Williams ProMar 400 Zero VOC Interior Latex Paint canSherwin-WilliamsProMar 400 Zero VOC Interior Latex PaintGloss · Extra White70GoodReplace
Documented facts for both products
FactProClassic Waterborne Interior Acrylic EnamelProMar 400 Zero VOC Interior Latex Paint
UseInterior paintInterior paint
Sheen · baseGloss · Extra WhiteGloss · Extra White
VOC (untinted)28 g/L2 g/L
VOC added by tintNot statedNot stated
Emissions testingNot documentedTested (GREENGUARD, LEED emissions)
Health certificationNone foundNone found
Safety Data Sheet warnings11
Ingredient disclosurePartial (environmental data sheet)Partial (environmental data sheet)
Safety Data Sheet revised8/9/20268/15/2026

Highlighted rows are where the two products differ. Facts come from each maker's documents; "not disclosed" means the maker hasn't published it, not that the product failed a test.

See the score broken down by category
Free. Answer 4 quick questions and create your account.

Compare another

Scores summarize the evidence makers publish. They don't guarantee safety or predict individual health outcomes. How we score

Sources

Sherwin-Williams ProClassic Waterborne Interior Acrylic Enamel