Side-by-side comparison

Sherwin-Williams ProClassic Waterborne Interior Acrylic Enamel Semi-Gloss High Reflective White vs Behr Behr PRO i300 Interior Semi-Gloss Deep Base

Sherwin-Williams ProClassic Waterborne Interior Acrylic Enamel canSherwin-WilliamsProClassic Waterborne Interior Acrylic EnamelSemi-Gloss · High Reflective White33PoorReplace
Behr Behr PRO i300 Interior canBehrBehr PRO i300 InteriorSemi-Gloss · Deep Base80ExcellentReplace
Documented facts for both products
FactProClassic Waterborne Interior Acrylic EnamelBehr PRO i300 Interior
UseInterior paintInterior paint
Sheen · baseSemi-Gloss · High Reflective WhiteSemi-Gloss · Deep Base
VOC (untinted)47 g/L1 g/L
VOC added by tintNot statedNot stated
Emissions testingNot documentedTested (GREENGUARD)
Health certificationNone foundNone found
Safety Data Sheet warnings2None
Ingredient disclosurePartial (environmental data sheet)Full list (Health Product Declaration)
Safety Data Sheet revised8/22/20265/19/2020

Highlighted rows are where the two products differ. Facts come from each maker's documents; "not disclosed" means the maker hasn't published it, not that the product failed a test.

See the score broken down by category
Free. Answer 4 quick questions and create your account.

Compare another

Scores summarize the evidence makers publish. They don't guarantee safety or predict individual health outcomes. How we score

Sources

Sherwin-Williams ProClassic Waterborne Interior Acrylic Enamel