Side-by-side comparison

Sherwin-Williams Scuff Tuff Interior Waterbased Enamel Semi-Gloss Ultradeep Base vs Sherwin-Williams ProMar 200 HP Zero VOC Interior Acrylic Semi-Gloss Ultradeep Base

Sherwin-Williams Scuff Tuff Interior Waterbased Enamel canSherwin-WilliamsScuff Tuff Interior Waterbased EnamelSemi-Gloss · Ultradeep Base63GoodReplace
Sherwin-Williams ProMar 200 HP Zero VOC Interior Acrylic canSherwin-WilliamsProMar 200 HP Zero VOC Interior AcrylicSemi-Gloss · Ultradeep Base73GoodReplace
Documented facts for both products
FactScuff Tuff Interior Waterbased EnamelProMar 200 HP Zero VOC Interior Acrylic
UseInterior paintInterior paint
Sheen · baseSemi-Gloss · Ultradeep BaseSemi-Gloss · Ultradeep Base
VOC (untinted)40 g/L0 g/L
VOC added by tintNot statedNot stated
Emissions testingTested (LEED emissions)Tested (GREENGUARD, LEED emissions)
Health certificationNone foundNone found
Safety Data Sheet warnings1None
Ingredient disclosurePartial (environmental data sheet)Partial (environmental data sheet)
Safety Data Sheet revised9/29/202610/15/2020

Highlighted rows are where the two products differ. Facts come from each maker's documents; "not disclosed" means the maker hasn't published it, not that the product failed a test.

See the score broken down by category
Free. Answer 4 quick questions and create your account.

Compare another

Scores summarize the evidence makers publish. They don't guarantee safety or predict individual health outcomes. How we score

Sources